IN THE WILD
What happens when we don’t begin with an anwer?
GLOBAL ORGANIZATION · STRATEGY · CULTURE · INNOVATION
They Thought They Needed Another Marketing Idea
For decades, the strategy had worked. It delivered consistent, predictable growth. Then, during a growth cycle in the broader economy, their revenue began to decline.
Consultants were engaged. New ideas came and went. They even acquired another company, only to struggle to integrate it. They weren't short of solutions. Yet revenue declined.
Each response made sense in isolation. But each was also another iteration on the same paradigm that had worked for decades.
What if another iteration wasn't what they needed?
We started with questions
Our work began with one senior executive in a co-creative relationship built around generative dialogue, inquiry, and knowledge sharing. We didn't start by looking for the marketing answer. We stepped back and looked at the whole, asking questions that went beneath the presenting problem:
What was really changing?
What future was worth creating?
Revenue hadn't stopped mattering. But it began to look less like the problem and more like a signal. As we widened the view, relationships among customers, employees, culture, leadership, the marketplace, and the wider stakeholder ecosystem began to come into focus. What had appeared to be a marketing problem was becoming a question about the organization's future.
Looking forward differently
For years, the organization had been looking forward by looking backward. Each new iteration began with what had worked before. The future was being managed on a spreadsheet.
Together, we changed the reference point. Instead of trying to predict what would happen next, we began paying closer attention to what was already changing across the marketplace and the wider stakeholder ecosystem.
We looked at emerging needs, changing behaviors, tensions, and possibilities. We paid attention to weak signals underneath the surface that were overlooked at the time, some of which later became much stronger signals of where things were heading.
The goal wasn't to predict the future correctly. It was to learn from what was changing.
And before deciding where to go, we opened the space for possibility.
We explored what could exist without allowing existing structures, assumptions, precedent, or today's constraints to decide too early what was possible.
Even familiar ways of describing the organization came into question. Thinking of itself as a social enterprise opened possibilities that its traditional organizational category had constrained, without changing the social purpose at the heart of its work.
Gradually, a different future came into view.
From possibility to strategy
Together, we shaped that future into a vision that was distinctive to the organization, meaningful to the people it served, and ambitious enough to create hope for what could come next. Then we began asking what would need to change to make it possible. The resulting strategy reached far beyond marketing. It connected direction and execution with people, culture, relationships, inner development, and the wider stakeholder ecosystem.
Culture change was embedded, not delegated.
If the strategy required people to work differently, culture couldn't be handed to HR after the strategy was finished. It was part of making the strategy possible.
As the organization developed a clearer sense of where it was going, its voice changed too. Internally and publicly, its language began to reflect the future it was trying to create rather than simply describe the organization it had been.
The strategy had to earn its way through the organization
The strategy wasn't rolled out. What began with one executive expanded to a small group, then gradually moved further into the organization. The executive built credibility by listening, involving people, bringing different perspectives into the work, and showing what the new direction could make possible.
Strategic workshops brought people across functions and levels into the same conversations, creating space to see beyond the boundaries of their own roles. New relationships formed. New responsibilities became visible. Roles emerged that hadn't been designed at the outset.
People who had traditionally worked within their own silos began exploring consequential questions and making strategic choices together.
Eventually, the work reached the new CEO. The response was simple:
“That's exactly how you should be doing this.”
What became possible
Revenue stopped declining.
But by then, the organization had changed how it thought about revenue itself. Revenue was no longer treated as the end goal. It became an outcome of creating the right conditions: a clearer sense of direction, stronger relationships, deeper listening, shared knowledge, and a culture capable of continually learning and creating.
The organization was becoming less dependent on outside expertise to determine what came next.
People who once operated primarily within their own areas began working more interdependently. Strategic decisions were increasingly made together. They became clearer about what fit their direction and, just as importantly, when to say no. Work that had seemed almost impossible at the beginning became possible.
Today, they can think through complex challenges more holistically. They can develop and write their own strategy. They have a deeper understanding of what is changing across their culture, customers, stakeholders, and ecosystem.
Perhaps the clearest evidence is their relationship with outside expertise. Their consultants are no longer leading them. They are leading their consultants.
Ideas once routinely acquired from outside are increasingly created from within. Consulting costs have dropped dramatically. New market ideas can be tested at virtually no incremental cost.
And those ideas are harder to copy. They emerge through relationships, deep listening, shared knowledge, and a stakeholder ecosystem competitors don't have.
What they create increasingly belongs to them.
They came looking for another marketing idea.
They became an organization capable of creating what comes next from within.